<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
		<title>Shrub | Site Wide Activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shrub.com/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shrub.com/activity/feed</link>
	<description>Site Wide Activity Feed</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://buddypress.org/?v=1.6.3</generator>
	<language></language>
	
						<item>
				<guid>http://shrub.com/activity/p/976/</guid>
				<title>maverynthia posted an update: Getting started :3</title>
				<link>http://shrub.com/activity/p/976/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:19:02 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>Getting started :3</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://shrub.com/2011/02/26/the-invitation-request-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-627</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the post, The Invitation Request Thread, on the site Shrub</title>
				<link>http://shrub.com/2011/02/26/the-invitation-request-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:11:49 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>Mark,<br />
I'm happy to send you an invitation, but it won't enable you to make comments that you can't already make. I double checked and this blog (such that it is) is open to all commenters, while the Official [&#8230;]</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-08_146#comment-47967</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the blog post &#34;Check my what?&#34; On privilege and what we can do about it</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-08_146#comment-47967</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:20:44 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>It's stated clearly in the <a href="http://blog.shrub.com/discussion-rules" rel="nofollow">Discussion Rules </a> that all comments are moderated. Usually before you comment on a site you should do a brief check to see if there is a posted discussion rules/guidelines and familiarize yourself with the code of conduct of that blog before posting. Blogs with some sort of policy will usually post [...]</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-08_146#comment-41901</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the blog post &#34;Check my what?&#34; On privilege and what we can do about it</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-08_146#comment-41901</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:28:53 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>For a general idea of the roles men play specifically in the radical feminist anti-porn movement, I would suggest reading up on relevant articles written by radical anti-porn feminists and (in cases where such questions would be welcome) asking various radical anti-porn feminists their personal opinions. My opinion isn't really relevant in this case, because [...]</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-08_146#comment-36098</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the blog post &#34;Check my what?&#34; On privilege and what we can do about it</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-08_146#comment-36098</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 04:17:19 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>You know what, I began typing out a comment trying -- yet again -- to explain to you that you aren't arguing with what I've wrote here because you aren't understanding what I've wrote. But, really, why should I spend time communicating with someone who is quite clearly not willing to do the same for [...]</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2011-03-03_840#comment-32089</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the blog post On slut-shaming, deleting comments, and respectful discourse</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2011-03-03_840#comment-32089</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:25:48 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>Thanks for the heads up, but as I said I felt an e-mail would be invasive when it was clear to me (based on the evidence at hand, which turned out to be faulty) that she was not interested in having contact with me. This is especially so when her e-mail is not readily available [...]</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-08_146#comment-32031</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the blog post &#34;Check my what?&#34; On privilege and what we can do about it</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-08_146#comment-32031</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 11:41:24 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<blockquote><p>I have a feeling this comment will be censored. </p></blockquote>
<p> And for that line alone I almost <i>did</i> choose not to allow this past moderation. Frankly, only trolls call choosing to maintain respectful dialogue by implementing discussion rules and moderation "censorship". And even if you're not purposely trolling (which you may not be, given that the rest of [...]</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2011-03-03_840#comment-32030</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the blog post On slut-shaming, deleting comments, and respectful discourse</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2011-03-03_840#comment-32030</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 11:01:59 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>I couldn't find an e-mail address.</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2011-03-03_840#comment-30497</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the blog post On slut-shaming, deleting comments, and respectful discourse</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2011-03-03_840#comment-30497</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 01:21:08 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>Thanks for the heads up, but saying "I don't mean to be disrespectful" and then saying something completely disrespectful is not allowed on this blog. This is your first, and last, warning. And, frankly, you're assuming bad faith on <b>my</b> part by assuming that there were no legitimate reasons for me to believe that my comments [...]</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2011-03-03_840#comment-30243</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the blog post On slut-shaming, deleting comments, and respectful discourse</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2011-03-03_840#comment-30243</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:41:58 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>I didn't feel that it belonged in the post, but for the purposes of a public record (and being fair) here's what I said on Twitter after I posted the reply that later got deleted:<br />
<blockquote>And this is the last time I'm ever going to Go Make Me a Sandwhich: <a href="http://bit.ly/hcpo8y" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/hcpo8y</a> Feminists defending misogyny makes me [...]</p></blockquote>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2011-03-03_840</guid>
				<title>tekanji wrote a new blog post: On slut-shaming, deleting comments, and respectful discourse</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2011-03-03_840</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:36:20 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p><b>ETA 2011/03/06: It turns out that my comments were marked as spam, not deleted; they have now been published. For some reason Blogspot, unlike WordPress (which most of my experience is with), displays your comment as properly posted after you hit the "post comment" button, even when it's been marked as spam. I'm leaving the post [...]</b></p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-08_146#comment-30228</guid>
				<title>Administrative Account commented on the blog post &#34;Check my what?&#34; On privilege and what we can do about it</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2006-03-08_146#comment-30228</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:42:01 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>Ask and ye shall receive (well, as long as it's a 10 second fix ^^).</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://shrub.com/2011/02/26/the-invitation-request-thread/</guid>
				<title>Administrative Account wrote a new blog post: The Invitation Request Thread</title>
				<link>http://shrub.com/2011/02/26/the-invitation-request-thread/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:52:15 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>In order to better deal with spam registration, I have introduced an invite code system. Anyone looking to get an account only need to post a comment here (be sure to put a valid e-mail address in the e-mail field) and I will sent you an invite.</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://shrub.com/activity/p/696/</guid>
				<title>Katie became a registered member</title>
				<link>http://shrub.com/activity/p/696/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 18:33:12 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					
											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-01-01_642#comment-15811</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the blog post Silent Hill Movie</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2007-01-01_642#comment-15811</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:04:33 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p><b>Nefer:</b> Actually, I <i>have</i> played all the way through the second. Just because I didn't finish the first game is no reason to assume that I hadn't played through any of the other games, especially because I state quite clearly that I'm a fan of the series. It's also no reason to assume that I don't know [...]</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2010-10-31_827#comment-13364</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the blog post This is why I hardly read blogs anymore</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2010-10-31_827#comment-13364</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:47:49 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>@Shiyiya: And you can't even talk to her about it; she made it very clear on the Sexist Beatdown thread with her defensive, sarcastic, and downright rude responses to Laurie who pointed out the problem with Sady's framing of female archetypes (the same issue I had that prompted me to read the post in the [...]</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2010-10-31_827#comment-12648</guid>
				<title>tekanji commented on the blog post This is why I hardly read blogs anymore</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2010-10-31_827#comment-12648</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:50:44 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>@Foreign-eyes: From what she said in the comments, Sady apparently doesn't have a problem with ableist slurs. Which, you know, is her right, but I find it deeply disturbing that she sees herself as "acknowledging and respecting" those who do. Respecting someone is incompatible with saying, "I know this hurts you but I'm going to [...]</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2010-10-31_827</guid>
				<title>tekanji wrote a new blog post: This is why I hardly read blogs anymore</title>
				<link>http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2010-10-31_827</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:48:50 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>In the past year the amount of (feminist) blogs that I read regularly, or even on an occasional basis, has shrunk to fit on one hand. Literally, aside from keeping up with <a href="http://theirisnetwork.org/" rel="nofollow">Iris</a>, the only blogs I regularly read are <a href="http://hoydenabouttown.com/" rel="nofollow">Hoyden About Town </a>, <a href="http://borderhouseblog.com/" rel="nofollow">The Border House </a>, <a href="http://geekfeminism.org/" rel="nofollow">Geek Feminism </a>, <a href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/" rel="nofollow">Sociological Images </a>, and <a href="http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Shakesville</a>. That's it. There are a few more that I'll [...]</p>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://shrub.com/activity/p/562/</guid>
				<title>tekanji and llencelyn are now friends</title>
				<link>http://shrub.com/activity/p/562/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:20:38 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					
											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://shrub.com/2010/09/26/the-feedback-thread/</guid>
				<title>Administrative Account wrote a new blog post: The Feedback Thread</title>
				<link>http://shrub.com/2010/09/26/the-feedback-thread/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 07:51:55 +0000</pubDate>

				<description>
					<![CDATA[
					<p>As of today Shrub has entered its beta testing phase, so we're looking for feedback on what kinds of things people would like to see for this site. While we welcome constructive criticism on any site-related subject, here are some specific items we're looking for feedback on: <b>Creating our mission statement and drawing members </b><br />
<blockquote>Ultimately, we're looking [...]</p></blockquote>

											<p>Comments: 0</p>
										]]>
				</description>
						</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  shrub.com/activity/feed/ ) in 1.13002 seconds, on May 25th, 2013 at 9:57 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 25th, 2013 at 10:57 am UTC -->